Dismissed¶8
Tapas Pachhal v. O Murmu Station Manager Matangini Ccc Wbsedcl and Anr.
Calcutta HCCPAN/825/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt application dismissed for default; petitioner's non-appearance on two consecutive occasions; alleged contemnors represented by counsel; petitioner deemed no longer interested in moving contempt application; dismissal without any order as to costs; background: alleged non-compliance with order requiring deposit of police help costs for WBSEDCL electricity connection; CPAN 825 of 2024 in WPA 17236 of 2021; judged by Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya; date 25.04.2025.
What did the court decide?
None; the contempt application CPAN 825 of 2024 was dismissed for default without any order as to costs. ¶8