Disposed¶19
Nilambar Mukherjee and Anr. v. Champak Panja
Calcutta HCCPAN/386/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposal of contempt application as infructuous due to petitioners' loss of interest and repeated non-representation; alleged compliance by restoration of electricity connection; CPAN 386 of 2022 in WPA No. 9084 of 2021; Nilambar Mukherjee v. Champak Panja; counsel Dr. Madhusudan Saha Ray for alleged contemnor; Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.; decided July 18, 2025; no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The Court found it evident that the petitioners had lost their interest in the contempt application. ¶17