Disposed¶15

Abu Kalam Mondal and Anr. v. Roshonara Mondal

Calcutta HC11 Jun 2025CO/432/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition disposed of (CO 432 of 2025, order dated 11.06.2025, Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.) concerning compliance with a trial court order dated 8th January, 2025 directing repair work. Opposite party claimed repairs complete and compliance report filed; petitioners alleged incomplete works in violation of the order and fresh construction. Court left determination of compliance or violation to the learned trial court, gave petitioners liberty to apply there, and did not decide merits. No statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court alleging violation of the order dated 8th January, 2025; all contentions left open. ¶15

Abu Kalam Mondal and Anr. Vs Roshonara Mondal — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

11.06.2025

¶2

Court No.652 Sl. No.20 Mujahid

¶3

CO 432 of 2025

¶4

Abu Kalam Mondal & Anr. Vs. Roshonara Mondal

¶5

Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya, Mr. Sounak Mondal, Mr. Abhirup Haldar

¶6

…for the petitioners

¶7

Mr. Debanik Banerjee, Mr. Aniruddha Ganguly, Mr. Krishna Nanda Dey, Ms. Huzaifa Shahid

¶8

…for the opposite party

¶9

1. Learned counsel for the opposite party states that in term of the order dated 8^th January, 2025, the repair work has already been carried out and the compliance report had also been filed. Learned counsel, therefore, submits that present petition has become infructuous.

¶10

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact the repair/construction which has been carried out is incomplete violation of order dated 8^th January, 2025 and the opposite party respondent has carried out new construction.

¶11

3. Perusal of the record and on consideration of the submission transpires that the repair has already been carried out, pursuant to the order dated 8^th

¶12

¶13

January, 2025. Whether that such

¶14

repair/construction is in terms of order dated 8^th January, 2025 or in violation of the same has to be determined by the learned trial court. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial court, if it considers that there is a violation of such order.

¶15

4. Learned counsel submits that in the circumstances it does not want to pursue the present petition and the present petition may be disposed off. In the circumstance present petition is disposed off, with the liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the learned Trial Court. It is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and all contentions have been left open.

¶16

5. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶17

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶18

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)

Abu Kalam Mondal and Anr. v. Roshonara Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abu Kalam Mondal and Anr. v. Roshonara Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Excel Bar and Resataurant Rep. by Muneshwar Lal and Anr. Vs the Andaman and Nicobar Administration and Ors.

Gurnam Singh Vs Koustav Biswas

Shibnath Roy Vs Satabdi Roy Aich

Merlyn Armsted and Anr. Vs Karnani Properties Ltd. and Ors.

Ruby Das Vs Prasanta Das

Chhamad Molla Vs Khokan Molla and Ors.