Disposed¶16

Shikha Nandi Basak v. Sukanta Basak

Calcutta HC2 Sept 2025CO/1464/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.O. 1464 of 2024; Shikha Nandi (Basak) v. Sukanta Basak; Article 227; objector in probate suit; analogous hearing; O.C. Case No. 6 of 2022; Title Suit No. 502 of 2019; City Civil Court at Calcutta, 2nd Bench; order no. 18 dated 21.12.2022; expedited disposal; no adjournments; no costs; disposed of on consent; interim order extension mentioned; Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.; decided 02.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Request issued to the learned Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta to take up the hearing of the analogous-hearing application on the next date fixed and dispose of the same expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments to either party; no order as to costs. ¶16

Shikha Nandi Basak Vs Sukanta Basak — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2025)

¶1

Sl.7 02.09.2025 Court No.6 BP

¶2

C.O. 1464 of 2024

¶3

Smt. Shikha Nandi (Basak)

¶4

-versus-

¶5

Sukanta Basak

¶6

Mr. Chittaranjan Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ramkrishna Chandra Ms. Puspa Rani Jaiswara … for the petitioner

¶7

Mr. Kausik Dey Mr. Debnath Mahata ..for the opposite party

¶8

This matter was mentioned for extension of interim order. When this matter is taken up, the learned advocates for the respective parties pray that the main civil revisional application be taken up for hearing.

¶9

With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties the civil revisional application is taken up for final hearing by treating the same as on the day’s list.

¶10

This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the objector in a probate suit and is directed against an order being no. 18 dated 21^st December, 2022 passed by the learned Judge, 2^nd Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in O.C. Case No. 6 of 2022.

¶11

By the said order a date was fixed for hearing of the application praying for analogous hearing of the probate suit being O.C. 6 of 2022 along with Title Suit

¶12

¶13

No. 502 of 2019 pending before the learned Judge, 2^nd Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta.

¶14

Mr. Chakraborty, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the application praying for analogous hearing of the two proceedings are still pending and the learned trial judge has not fixed any date for hearing of such application.

¶15

Mr. Dey, learned advocate appearing for the opposite party submits that the learned trial judge be directed to dispose of the said application expeditiously.

¶16

In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocates for the respective parties, C.O. 1464 of 2024 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Judge, 2^nd Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta to take up the hearing of the application for analogous hearing on the next date fixed and to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶17

There shall be, however, no order as to costs.

¶18

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

¶19

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

Shikha Nandi Basak v. Sukanta Basak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shikha Nandi Basak v. Sukanta Basak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swapan Maity Vs Sakshi Gopal Chakraborty and Anr.

M/S Deecon India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Manjusha Nandy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ncdex E Markets Ltd. Vs Authorised Officer Canara Bank and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs Nitu Gupta

Anju Dutta Vs Syed Firojuddin