Disposed¶16

Badal Roy and Anr. v. Prasenjit Ray and Ors.

Calcutta HC25 Feb 2025APOT/218/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Typographical correction of cause title; order sheet; APO 59 of 2024; APOT 183 of 2024; APOT 218 of 2024; WPO 1248 of 2022; Asok Kumar Roy; Ashoke/Asoke; Prasenjit Ray; Prasenjit Roy; Badal Roy; Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC); Debangsu Basak; Md. Shabbar Rashidi; High Court at Calcutta; judgment and order dated 25 February 2025; order dated 27 February 2025; counsel appearance reattribution; Amal Kr. Ganguly Sr. Adv.; Bikash Ranjan Neogi; Ananya Neogi; Arijit Dey; Alak Kr. Ghosh; Swapan Kr. Debnath; Sima Chakraborty; Fazlul Haque.

What did the court decide?

Administrative order directing correction of typographical errors in the cause title of the judgment and order dated February 25, 2025, with the specific replacements set out in the order sheet. ¶16

Badal Roy and Anr. Vs Prasenjit Ray and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Administrative order directing correction of typographical errors in the cause title of the judgment and order dated February 25, 2025, with the specific replacements set out in the order sheet.

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether and how typographical errors in the cause title of the judgment and order dated February 25, 2025 are to be corrected.

¶16

Court's answer

The Court directed that typographical errors in the cause title of the judgment and order dated February 25, 2025 be corrected.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

Specified cause-title corrections: “APOT 183 of 2024” to be replaced with “APO 59 of 2024”; “Ashoke” to be replaced with “Asoke”; and “APO 59 of 2024” appearing just prior to “Prasenjit Roy & Others” to be replaced with “APOT 183 of 2024”.

¶18

Key takeaways

On the second page of the judgment, “APO 59 of 2024” is to be replaced with “APOT 183 of 2024”.ratio¶19
The appearance of Mr. Amal Kr. Ganguly, Sr. Adv., Mr. Bikash Ranjan Neogi, Adv. and Ms. Ananya Neogi, Adv., recorded in the portion headed “For the appellant in APOT 183 of 2024”, is to be shown instead for APO 59 of 2024.ratio¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order sheet of the High Court at Calcutta (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Original Side), Coram: Debangsu Basak and Md. Shabbar Rashidi JJ., dated 27 February 2025, in APO 59 of 2024 (with WPO 1248 of 2022), APOT 183 of 2024 and APOT 218 of 2024. The Court directed correction of typographical errors in the cause title of the judgment and order dated 25 February 2025: interchanging the labels “APOT 183 of 2024” and “APO 59 of 2024” at specified places (including on the second page), replacing “Ashoke” with “Asoke”, and reattributing the recorded appearance of Mr. Amal Kr. Ganguly, Sr. Adv., Mr. Bikash Ranjan Neogi, Adv. and Ms. Ananya Neogi, Adv. from APOT 183 of 2024 to APO 59 of 2024. Administrative/clerical correction only; no substantive legal issue decided; no statute or precedent cited.

Badal Roy and Anr. v. Prasenjit Ray and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badal Roy and Anr. v. Prasenjit Ray and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Srikanta Haldar Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Manas Chakraborty and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal

Sambhu Mondal @ Faring Vs the State of West Bengal

Asoke Kumar Roy and Ors. Vs Prasenjit Ray and Ors.

Prasenjit Ray and Ors. Vs Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Ashim Saha Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.