Anil Agarwal and Anr. v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anil Agarwal and another v. Reserve Bank of India and others, WPO/717/2024, High Court at Calcutta (Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction, Original Side), Justice Shampa Sarkar, 1 August 2024 — writ petition disposed of; mandamus seeking parity with customers who paid dues on time and normal closure of an NPA account settled under a one-time settlement (written-off) refused; bank's customer-rating policy (settlement/written-off vs normal closure) held to be within the bank's exclusive jurisdiction and beyond writ direction; bank to clarify reasons for non-normal closure. Keywords: mandamus, NPA, default, one-time settlement, written-off account, normal closure, bank rating policy, writ jurisdiction, disposal.
What did the court decide?
The bank is to issue an intimation to the petitioner clarifying the reason why the petitioner's account could not be treated as a normal closure account.