Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Tribunal seeking preponement of the hearing and expeditious disposal, with no order as to costs.
Liberty to petitioners to apply to the Tribunal for preponement and expeditious disposal; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.09.2024
rpan/ 07
WPLRT 130 of 2024
Kalpataru Maity & Others
– Versus –
The State of West Bengal & Others
Mr. Golam Mastafa, Mr. Tarasankar Ssmanta
… for the Petitioners. Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Ms. Debdooti Dutta, Mr. S. Adak
... for the State/Respondents.
On the prayer of Mr. Mastafa, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prefer an appropriate application before the learned Tribunal seeking preponement of the date of hearing and expeditious disposal.
Needless to observe, in the event such application is filed, the same shall be considered by the learned Tribunal, in accordance with law.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Kalpataru Maity & Others
The State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
