Chandana Pradhan v. Allahabad Bank & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner on multiple dates despite the matter being called.
Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner on multiple dates despite the matter being called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA 7933 of 2013
N.22Sl
151/CL 07.11.24 Sl-49 Ct.33 (S.R.)
Chandana Pradhan
v.
Allahabad Bank & Ors.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought for when the matter was called on 22nd August, 2024, 23rd August, 2024 and 27th August, 2024. Today also when the matter is called for none appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Chandana Pradhan
Allahabad Bank
Ors.
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court