Disposed¶13

M/S Essem Jute Industries Ltd. v. E.P.F. Org and Ors.

Calcutta HC9 Jan 2024WPA/393/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Essem Jute Industries Ltd. v. Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation; WPA/393/2022; High Court at Calcutta, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri; decided 09.01.2024 by M. V. Muralidaran, J.; EPF & MP Act 1952 Sections 7(A) and 7-I; alternative statutory remedy of appeal; Article 226 writ disposed of with liberty to appeal within two weeks; appellate authority to decide within twelve weeks; no appearance for petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 7-I of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 against the order dated 13.08.2021 within two weeks; appellate authority directed to decide the appeal within twelve weeks of receipt. ¶13

M/S Essem Jute Industries Ltd. Vs E.P.F. Org and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

09.01.2024 Item No.11 As

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side

¶3

WPA/393/2022

¶4

M/S. ESSEM JUTE INDUSTRIES LTD.

¶5

VS EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ORS.

¶6

Mr. Bhaskar Roy Mahashaya, ...for the P.F. Authority

¶7

None appears for the petitioner even in the second call.

¶8

When the matter was called on 05.01.2024, none appears for the petitioner whereas Mr. Bhaskar Roy Mahashaya, learned counsel for the Provident Fund authorities appeared. Therefore, by giving one more chance, the matter was adjourned today.

¶9

When the matter is taken up today, there was no representation for the petitioner whereas the learned counsel for the Provident Fund authorities has represented before this Court that the order impugned in this writ petition is an appealable order. He has further submitted that the order was passed under Section 7(A) of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 against which the petitioner is having a right to file an appeal

¶10

¶11

under Section 7-I of the said Act of 1952 before the appellate authority. Instead of invoking the appellate jurisdiction, the petitioner has approached this Court and filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which is not maintainable. Therefore, he prayed this Court to dismiss the writ petition by giving opportunity to file appeal.

¶12

On hearing the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the respondent and perusing the records and the Act, it is made clear that sine the order has been passed under Section 7 of the said Act, the petitioner is having a right to file an appeal under Section 7-I of the 1952 Act. Therefore, I am inclined to pass the following order:

¶13

a) The writ petition is disposed of;

¶14

b) The petitioner is given liberty to file an appeal against the order dated 13.08.2021 which was passed under Section 7(A) of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶15

c) On receipt of the said appeal by the appellate authority within the time stipulated by this Court, the appellate authority is directed to pass appropriate

¶16

¶17

orders on the appeal within a period of twelve weeks thereof;

¶18

With the above observation, this writ petition

¶19

stands disposed of.

¶20

(M. V. MURALIDARAN, J.)

M/S Essem Jute Industries Ltd. v. E.P.F. Org and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Essem Jute Industries Ltd. v. E.P.F. Org and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maa Kalpana Enterprise and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nilu Goel @ Nilu Jain Goel Vs Aditya Jain

Md. Belayet Hossain Vs Union of Inidia and Ors.

Kallal Chakraborty Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sukumar Ghosh and Ors. Vs Sanchayita Ghosh and Ors.

Sukumar Ghosh and Ors. Vs Sanchayita Ghosh and Ors.