Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear or seek accommodation on multiple dates when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA 31451 of 2013
N.22Sl
151/CL 17.09.24 Sl-18 Ct.33 (S.R.)
Suranjan Barai
v.
Union of India & Ors.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought for when the matter was called on 12th September, 2024 and 13th September, 2024. Today also when the matter is called for none appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Suranjan Barai
Union of India
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
