Smti. Manjula Devi Vs the Andaman and Nicobar Administration

The petitioners’ predecessor one R.C. Biswas is the recorded owner of area of 0.70 hectares of land at School Line Village, near Airport at Port Blair. The said land remained out of the lands sold by their predecessor father.

¶13

The petitioners claim that they are paying land revenue for the said land for some substantial period of time.

¶14

Several rounds of litigation have occurred against the Deputy Commissioner, South Andaman and several directions have been issued by various Benches of this Court, inter alia, in WP No.290 of 2015 dated 24.09.2015, in MAT/028/2015 on 27.11.2015, in WP No.383 of 2016 dated 06.12.2016 in WP No.092 of 2018 by a judgment dated 14.08.2018 and WPA/29/2022 by an order dated 22.04.2022.

¶15

Against each of the aforesaid orders, the Deputy Commissioner has consistently replied as follows: - that the land of 0.70 hectares under the Survey No.14/P was mutated in

¶16

the joint names of Anjana Devi andn 13 others, i.e. the writ petitioners.

¶17

The defence establishment has constructed a road on the land in question with the full knowledge of the petitioners and no objection was ever raised.

¶18

Reference is made to section 162(c) of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 to argue that the right of tenant has been extinguished under clause (c) when a part of such land has been transferred/let out to use in contravention of the Regulation.

¶19

It is also contended that the petitioners did not take steps to reclaim the land on which the road was constructed by the MES.

¶20

Admittedly the petitioners are not claiming the land on which the road was constructed. They only claim the remaining areas of 0.70 hectares of land which remains outside the scope of the road construction.

¶21

The Deputy Commissioner has gone on record on six occasions that the land was never acquired by the Administration. It would, therefore, normally follow that the possession of the land comprising 0.70 hectares must either be returned to the petitioners or any alternative land of 0.70 hectares must be made available to the petitioners by the Administration and/or the MES.

¶22

In view of the above, this Court directs the Secretary (Revenue) of the Andaman and Nicobar Administration to take a decision in the matter i.e., either to return the possession of 0.70 hectares of land to the petitioners or provide them with

¶23

alternate land of equal value and location within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.

¶24

The road constructed by the MES shall not be disturbed by the Administration or claimed by the petitioners.

¶25

The petitioners may be heard formally by the Secretary (Revenue) and the land proposed to be offered to the petitioners shall be indicated to them in writing.

¶26

The Secretary (Revenue) shall also consider a choice of land comprising of 0.70 hectares, that may be requested by the petitioners for being returned to them.

¶27

It is reiterated that the land to the extent of 0.70 hectares must be of equal value, location and importance.

¶28

The order of the Deputy Commissioner, South Andaman dated 30.05.2024 shall stand set side.

¶29

With the above directions, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of without any order as to costs.

¶30

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for,

¶31

be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.

¶32

( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )

Smti. Manjula Devi v. the Andaman and Nicobar Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smti. Manjula Devi v. the Andaman and Nicobar Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Andaman and Nicobar Cooperative Workers Union Vs Andaman and Nicobar State Cooperative Bank Limited

The Deputy Conservator of Forests Vs P.Tata Rao and Others

K.Chella Ponnu Vs the Andaman and Nicobar Administration and Ors.

Andaman and Nicobar Pri Karamchari Sangh Vs the Hon'Ble Lt Governor

Andaman and Nicobar Pri Karmachari Sangh Vs the Honorable Lieutenant Governor

Saju K Moideen Vs the Andaman and Nicobar Administration and Others