The petitioner alleged illegal construction on land recorded as Immambara and sought action. The court held that such matters fall within the jurisdiction of revenue authorities. The petition was dismissed with liberty to submit a fresh representation to the Sub-Divisional Officer for enquiry and disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.07.2024 Ct. No.1
Item No.10 PG/KS
W.P.A.(P) 260 of 2024
Abdul Halim Molla Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Abdul Halim Molla
Sk. Md. Galib Ms. Sujata Mukherjee Mr. Debabrata Sardar Mr. Mrinal Kanti Maity
…..Petitioner (In person) …..for the State
2
the writ court as it is the revenue authorities, who will have to examine the requests.
(T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can adjudicate the allegation of illegal construction on land recorded as Immambara.
Abdul Halim Molla
The State of West Bengal
T.S Sivagnanam
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
