Disposed¶19

Kokila Sardar @ Kokila Kanta Sardar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC12 Nov 2024WPA/2541/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPA 2541 of 2024; Kokila Sardar @ Kokila Kanta Sardar @ Kakil Sardar v. State of West Bengal & Ors.; ration dealer; assault, abuse, threats for refusing illegal payment; goods worth Rs.1,50,000/- destroyed; police inaction; Canning P.S. Case No.84 dated 03/02/2024; Sections 447/323/427/384/506/34 IPC; 3 PDPP Act; Section 173 report; investigation to logical conclusion; petition disposed of; no costs; Tirthankar Ghosh, J.; decided 12.11.2024.

What did the court decide?

Investigation agency directed to take the investigation of Canning P.S. Case No.84 to its logical conclusion (including filing the Section 173 report before the jurisdictional Court if pending); State's report kept on record with a copy supplied to petitioner's counsel; writ petition disposed of with no order as to costs. ¶19

Kokila Sardar @ Kokila Kanta Sardar Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

D/L 59 12.11.2024 Rohit/Aritra ct.no.35

¶3

WPA 2541 of 2024

¶4

Kokila Sardar @ Kokila Kanta Sardar @ Kakil Sardar Versus

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Yashraj Roy, Ms. Sangeeta Singh …for the petitioners

¶7

Mr. Jyoti Prakash Chatterjee ….for the State

¶8

Mr. Abhniav Rakshit …. For the respondent No.4 to 6

¶9

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is kept with the record.

¶10

Petitioner complains that he is a ration

¶11

dealer, whose business materials amounting to Rs.1,50,000/- were thrown away by the private respondents, petitioner was assaulted, abused, threatened because of the petitioner refusing to pay any illegal money as claimed by the private respondents.

¶12

It has further been alleged by the learned advocate for the petitioner that in spite of reporting to the police station no steps have been taken.

¶13

Learned advocate for the State has submitted a report. Report reflects that Canning P.S. Case No.84 dated 03/02/2024 has been registered under

¶14

¶15

Sections 447/323/427/384/506/34 of IPC and 3 PDPP Act.

¶16

Learned advocate represents the respondents and opposing the contention submits that the respondents have been falsely implicated by way of wild allegations.

¶17

Having considered the purpose for which the writ petition has been preferred and the same being addressed by the State. Further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted. The investigation agency is directed to take the investigation to its logical conclusion if till date the report under Section 173 has not been filed before the jurisdictional Court.

¶18

Report so submitted be kept with the record. A copy of the report be handed over to the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition being WPA 2541 of 2024 is disposed of.

¶20

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

All concerned parties shall act on the server

¶22

copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶23

¶24