Disposed

Jamuna Pal v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC4 Nov 2024WPA/25266/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition over non-acceptance of statutory fees on the petitioner's Form-I application for a stage carriage permit on the Kukrahati-Banspahari route. Court directed the respondent to accept the fees and consider the permit prayer in accordance with law within six weeks, after hearing.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to accept statutory fees on Form-I and decide the permit prayer in accordance with law after hearing, within six weeks.

Jamuna Pal Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WPA 25266 of 2024

¶2

4.11.2024 Jamuna Pal ct.25, sl. 28 vs sk The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶3

Mr. N.I.Khan Mr. Amlan Kr. Mukherjee …for the petitioner.

¶4

Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Ld. A.G.P Mr. Pannalal Bandopadhyay …for the State respondent.

¶5

Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

¶6

The writ petitioner is aggrieved that due to nonreceipt of the statutory fees pursuant to his application for grant of stage carriage permit by the State Authorities, the process of grant of permit cannot be proceeded with. Hence, grant of permit to the petitioner is also hindred, thereby jeopardizing the rights of the petitioner.

¶7

Mr. Khan, learned advocate, appearing for the writ petitioner, seeks that the respondent no. 4 be directed to immediately accept the requisite statutory fees pursuant to statutory Form-I as submitted by the petitioner for grant of permit.

¶8

Mr. Deb Roy, learned advocate is representing the State authority in this case and submits that the statutory fees is required to be submitted for further processes, in respect of grant of prayer of the petitioner.

¶9

¶10

It appears that on 28^th December, 2022, the petitioner had submitted statutory Form-I, for grant of permit with respect to the route Kukrahati to Banspahari. Therefore, it is required that the fees be accepted with respect to the said Form, for further consideration for grant of permit to the petitioner.

¶11

The Court is therefore, inclined to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent to immediately accept the requisite statutory fees from the writ petitioner pursuant to the statutory Form-I submitted by him and consider his prayer for grant of permit in accordance with law.

¶12

In doing so, the respondent shall afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and dispose of his prayer within six weeks from the date of communication of copy of this order. .

¶13

Since no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for in this case, all allegations made in this writ petition are deemed to have been denied by the concerned respondent.

¶14

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.

¶16

(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)

¶17

Jamuna Pal v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamuna Pal v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bengal Lamps Ltd. Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Madhumita Roy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Milan Kumar Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Dilip Kumar Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Prasanta Sahoo Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Md. Salman Mondal Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.