Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear on either call; the interim order previously granted was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.8. 2024 item No.87 n.b. ct. no.24 WPA 25199 of 2023
Md. Lukman Ali
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shuvro P. Lahiri Md. Habibur Rahaman Mr. Rajesh Naskar
…..for the respondent no.6
Mr. Suman Sengupta Mr. Sambuddha Dutta Mr. Sanatan Panja
…..for the State
None appears on behalf of the petitioner on first call.
On second call, no one represents the petitioner.
No accommodation is sought for.
Considering the matter it appears to me that the petitioner is not at all interested to proceed further with this matter.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order passed earlier by this Court during the pendency of this matter is hereby also vacated.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Md. Lukman Ali
State of West Bengal
Subhendu Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
