The court dismissed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 22543 of 2018 for default due to lack of representation by the petitioners and further unwarranted pendency.
The writ petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L58 29.07.2024 Bpg. ct.no.35
W.P.A.22543 of 2018
Aquib Rouf and others Versus Union of India and another
Mr. Vipul Kundalia. ...for the Union of India.
The writ petition is of the year 2018.
Records reflect that there was lack of
persuasion on behalf of the petitioners.
Learned advocate for the Union of India is present.
Having considered that none represented the petitioners on 12.06.2024 and 15.07.2024 as also today when the matter has been called, I am of the view that further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted.
Accordingly, WPA 22543 of 2018 is dismissed for default.
There will be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
2
Urgent photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Aquib Rouf and others
Union of India
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
