Aswini Kumar and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the private respondents are creating obstruction in the matter of cultivation of the land by the petitioner.

¶12

The learned advocate for the private respondent submits that the petitioner is not in possession of the property and the private respondents are in possession of the same. He also submits that recording of the name of the petitioner in the Record of Rights is erroneous.

¶13

Learned advocate for the State submits that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature and the police

¶14

2

¶15

authority cannot decide the same.

¶16

After hearing the learned advocates of the respective parties and considering the materials on record, this Court is of the considered view that there is a dispute between the private parties with regard to possession of an immovable property. The police authorities cannot decide the issue of possession of private parties. It will be open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for necessary relief. However, the police authorities shall ensure that no breach of peace take place at the locale.

¶17

With the above observations and directions, the

¶18

writ petition stands disposed of.

¶19

There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

¶20

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

Aswini Kumar and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aswini Kumar and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Basanti Naskar and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Narendra Kumar Mishra Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Manas Sarkar and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Suvendu Saha @ Subhendu Saha Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Manika Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.