Sumanta Kumar Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

It appears that the Board had indicated a specified time period within which application for obtaining TET Certificate was to be filed. The petitioner,

¶14

2

¶15

for reasons best known to him, did not apply within the stipulated period.

¶16

The petitioner relies upon the guidelines of the NCTE relating to award of TET Certificate.

¶17

Learned advocate representing the Board submits that the petitioner ought to have made a formal application before the Board prior to invoking the writ jurisdiction.

¶18

Admittedly, the petitioner did not file any representation before the Board seeking redressal of his grievances.

¶19

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by observing that it will be open for the petitioner to apply before the Board for issuance of the TET Certificate.

¶20

In the event such request is made, the same shall be considered by the Board at the earliest but positively within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶21

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

¶23

( Amrita Sinha, J.)

Sumanta Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumanta Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Balaji Texspin Private Limited and Ors. Vs State Bank of India Ors.

Chandra Sekhar Bag Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Kabita Biswas Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Sunil Chandra Mandal Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Brahamananda Sandhaki Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Prafulla Kumar Nayek and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.