The writ petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple occasions without seeking accommodation. No substantive legal issue was discussed or decided. The interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA 19909 of 2017
N.22Sl
151/CL 05.09.24 Sl-51 Ct.33 (S.R.)
Ratan Dey
v.
Central Bank of India & Ors.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought for when the matter was called on 14th August, 2024, 16th August, 2024 and 19th August, 2024. Today also when the matter is called for none appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition being WPA 19909 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Ratan Dey
Central Bank of India & Ors.
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
