Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear and appeared disinterested in proceeding. Any interim order passed during pendency was vacated.
Petition dismissed for default; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16 .07.2024 SL No.16 Court No.24 Ali
WPA 19507 of 2023
Nasima Sultana Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Uday Narayan Betal, Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick, Mr. M. Patra
….…for the private respondent No. 8.
None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
No accommodation is sought for on behalf of
the petitioners.
Private respondent No. 8 is present.
Having heard the learned advocate for the respondent No. 8, it appears to me that the present petitioner was not attended the Court on the earlier occasion.
Thus, it further appears to me that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with this matter.
Thus, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, passed by this Court
during the pendency of this matter is also vacated.
(Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Nasima Sultana
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Subhendu Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
