Disposed

Rahul Dutta v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC29 Jul 2024WPA/14986/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner applied for TET 2022 under the death-in-harness category with 5% relaxation but was treated as General Category, leaving him unqualified. Court directed the Board's Secretary to rectify his sub-category and issue a fresh certificate if he qualifies, within four weeks; permission to join the 2022 recruitment process refused as no candidate was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to rectify sub-category and issue fresh certificate if qualified within four weeks; participation in 2022 recruitment denied.

Rahul Dutta Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

29.07.2024. PB Sl. No.42. Ct. No.14.

¶2

In The High Court At Calcutta Constitution Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side

¶3

WPA 14986 of 2024

¶4

Rahul Dutta Vs

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas, Ms. Payel Shome, Ms. Sampriti Saha, Ms. Avijit Kar.

¶7

……for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Mr. S. Mitra.

¶9

……for the State.

¶10

Mr. Ratul Biswas, Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury. …….for the WBBPE

¶11

Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.

¶12

The petitioner participated in the Teacher Eligibility Test, 2022 in terms of the notification published by the West Bengal Board of Primary Education on 29^th September, 2022. The said notification prescribes 5% relaxation of marks in

¶13

¶14

senior secondary or its equivalent examination in several categories including death-in-harness.

¶15

The petitioner applied for obtaining the benefit under the death-in-harness category. Admit Card was issued in his favour in the death-in-harness category, but surprisingly, at the time of declaration of the TET result, the sub-category of the petitioner has been kept blank. The petitioner obtained 84% marks out of 150 marks.

¶16

It has been submitted that had the 5% relaxation of marks been given to the petitioner, he would have been qualified in the TET examination.

¶17

The petitioner has also prayed for a direction upon the Board to issue the TET qualified certificate in his favour and permit him to take part in the recruitment process of the year 2022.

¶18

Learned advocate representing the Board submits that TET qualified certificate in respect of the year 2022 was not issued to any candidate prior to the recruitment process of the year 2022.

¶19

On the face of records, it appears that the petitioner applied for getting relaxation under the death-in-harness category. The marks obtained by the petitioner does not reflect the relaxation of marks. The petitioner, in fact, has been treated as a General

¶20

¶21

Category candidate, without the relaxation under the death-in-harness category.

¶22

Accordingly, the Secretary, West Bengal Board of Primary Education is directed to take necessary steps to rectify the sub-category of the petitioner and thereafter issue fresh certificate, in the event, the petitioner qualifies in TET 2022.

¶23

As regards the permission sought for participating in the recruitment process of the year 2022, as it has been submitted that none of the candidates who participated in the TET 2022 examination has been permitted to take the selection test, accordingly, the prayer made by the petitioner for appearing in the recruitment process cannot be allowed.

¶24

Steps shall be taken by the Secretary at the earliest, but, positively within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶25

It goes without saying that it will be open for the petitioner to take part in the subsequent recruitment process initiated by the Board if he qualifies TET.

¶26

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶27

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

¶28

¶29

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

Rahul Dutta v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Dutta v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Donald and Macarthy Pte. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 2 Others

Purva Singh and Anr. Vs Union of India and Anr.

MD Ezaz Ahmed and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Lilly Maritime Pvt. Ltd. Vs Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port, Kolkata (Kolkata Port Trust) and Anr.

Sandhya Mandal Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Biswanath Ghorui Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.