Petitioners withdrew WPA 11421 of 2018 and connected application after submitting a communication dated 02.01.2024 expressing lack of desire to proceed. Court dismissed petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 15.01.2024
sb Ct 550
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 11421 of 2018 With
CAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CAN 1049 of 2020)
Chittaranjan Adhikary & Anr.
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Achin Kumar Majumder Ms. Ananya Adhikary
… For the petitioners.
Mr. A. K. Mishra
… For the respondent nos. 1 to 5
Mr. Majumder, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, by placing before this Court a communication dated 2nd January, 2024 written by the petitioners, submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant writ petition.
Mr. Mishra, learned advocate representing the respondent nos. 1 to 5 does not oppose to such prayer and submits that the grievance of the petitioners has already been met.
Having regard to the aforesaid and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant writ petition, let the writ petition along with the connected application be dismissed as withdrawn.
Let the communication dated 2nd January, 2024 written by the petitioners addressed to the petitioners’ advocate be retained with the records.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Chittaranjan Adhikary & Anr.
Union of India & Ors.
Raja Basu Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
