Writ petition filed in 2016 seeking appointment as a teacher remained pending until the petitioner crossed the age of 60. Counsel submitted nothing survived, and the writ petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 1013 of 2016
Tarun Rai Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Krishna Deo Das
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking his appointment as a teacher. Since the writ petition was filed in the year 2016 and the same was pending till date, by that time, the petitioner has crossed the age of 60 years. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all necessary formalities.
(M. V. Muralidaran, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking appointment as a teacher survives after the petitioner crossed the age of 60 years.
Tarun Rai
The State of West Bengal
M. V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
