Petitioner abandoned the writ petition. Court dismissed the application for non-prosecution and vacated any interim order.
WPA dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD-01 Ct No.09 07.02.2024 TN
WPA No. 10062 of 2023
Prasanta Mutt
Vs.
The Punjab National Bank and others
Ms. Dipika Sarkar, Mr. Siddhant Srivastava
…. for the petitioner
Mr. Abhishek Banerjee, Ms. Parna Roy Choudhury, Ms. Payel Ghosh
…. for the PNB
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed any further with the matter.
2. Accordingly, WPA No. 10062 of 2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Prasanta Mutt
The Punjab National Bank and others
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
