A contempt application alleging non-compliance with an earlier writ order was disposed of after the petitioner reported substantial compliance during its pendency; the court declined to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27 05.03.2026 Ct No.11 rrc
CPAN 1829 of 2025
(Sri Tilak Biswas Vs. Hirdyesh Mohan & Ors.) in WP.ST 148 of 2024
Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh Ms. Priyanka Saha …for the petitioner Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Govt. Adv. Ms. Priyamvada Singh … for the alleged contemnors
Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits, upon instruction, that during pendency of the present application, the order of this Court dated 9th December, 2024 passed in a writ petition being WP.ST 148 of 2024, has been substantially complied with.
In view thereof, we are not inclined to proceed with the contempt application any further and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Tilak Biswas
Hirdyesh Mohan
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
