The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution by the petitioners, who submitted that the order under challenge had already been complied with.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.09.2024 Item No.11 Court No.11 Avijit Mitra
WP.CT 261 of 2024
In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And
Union of India & ors.
- versus - Priyanshu Kumar & ors.
Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborty,
Ms. Debjani Ghoshal ….for the petitioners Mr. S.K. Dutta, Mr. Barun Chatterjee …for the respondents
Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the respondents submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the order under challenge has already been complied with.
In view of the above, the petitioners do not want to proceed with the writ petition. The written instruction, as produced by Mr. Chakraborty, is taken on record.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for ‘ nonprosecution’ .
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee,J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Priyanshu Kumar
Union of India
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
