A writ petition under Article 226 against the State of West Bengal was withdrawn at the petitioner's request and dismissed, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
Dismissal as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh on selfsame cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.08.2024 Item No.33 Court No.11 Avijit Mitra
WP.CT 228 of 2024
In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And
Himadri Chowdhury
- versus - State of West Bengal & ors.
Mr. Victor Chatterjee ….for the petitioner
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. A.G.P., Ms. Ashmita Chakraborty …for the State respondents
On the prayer of Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘ withdrawn ’ with liberty to file afresh on the selfsame cause of action.
The petitioner would be at liberty to take back the certified copy of the order impugned upon furnishing a photostat copy of the same to the department.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee,J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Himadri Chowdhury
State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
