Petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners did not wish to proceed with the writ petition; the written instruction was taken on record and the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.09.2024 Item No.01 Court No.11 Avijit Mitra
WP.CT 175 of 2017
In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And
Union of India & ors. - versus -
Tushar Kanti Ghosh & ors.
Mr. Asok Bhowmik
….for the petitioners
Mr. Bhowmik, learned advocate representing the petitioners submits, upon instruction, that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the writ petition. The written instruction, as submitted by Mr. Bhowmik, is taken on record.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for ‘non-prosecution’.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee,J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India & ors.
Tushar Kanti Ghosh & ors.
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
