Dismissal for default due to repeated non-appearance of appellant; SAT 45 of 2020 and CAN 1 of 2021 dismissed without costs; Bulbul Chatterjee v. Dhirendra Nath Dutta; dated 12.11.2024; bench of Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Uday Kumar, JJ.
No relief; the appeal and the connected application were dismissed for default without any order as to costs. ¶6
As none appeared for the appellant for the second time at the time of call, SAT 45 of 2020 and CAN 1 of 2021 were dismissed for default, without any order as to costs. ¶6
AD-4 Ct No.16 12.11.2024 (SSS)
SAT 45 of 2020 With IA No: CAN 1 of 2021
Smt. Bulbul Chatterjee Vs. Sri Dhirendra Nath Dutta
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether SAT 45 of 2020 and CAN 1 of 2021 should be dismissed for default on account of the appellant's repeated non-appearance at the time of call.medium confidence¶6
As none appeared for the appellant for the second time at the time of call, SAT 45 of 2020 and CAN 1 of 2021 were dismissed for default, without any order as to costs.ratio¶6
How this case reached the court
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
