In the absence of the appellant who did not appear, and noting the deficit court fees without a prayer for extension, the Single Appellate Court dismissed the appeal. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
None. The appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06 19.01.24
S.A.T. 127 of 2023
Ct. No. 04
akd
Gopal Chandra Das alias Gopal Chandra Das Bichali Vs.
Subimal Das
There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called on.
The report of the Stamp Reporter indicates that the instant appeal has been filed with deficit Court fees of Rs.120/-.
There is no prayer for extension of time to put in the deficit Court fees.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
2
Gopal Chandra Das alias Gopal Chandra Das Bichali
Subimal Das
Harish Tandon
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
