Dismissed¶8
Baidyanath Gupta @ B.M. Gupta v. Latika Sarkar
Calcutta HCSA/350/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Default dismissal of a long-dormant appeal-numbered file: SA 350 of 1995, Baidyanath Gupta @ B.M. Gupta versus Latika Sarkar; dated 20.06.2024; repeated non-appearance recorded ('None appears'; 'On previous occasion also,'); operative order 'Let the matter be dismissed for default'; single-judge sign-off by Justice Sugato Majumdar; no statutes, precedents, advocates or monetary figures anywhere in the record.
What did the court decide?
Since none appeared on this occasion and none appeared on the previous occasion as well, the court directed that the matter be dismissed for default. ¶8