In the absence of appearance on behalf of the appellant, the appeal and connected application were dismissed for default, and interim orders were vacated.
Appeal and connected application dismissed for default; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.01.2024 sayandeep Sl. No. 35 Ct. No. 04
SA 132 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2018 (Old CAN 9042 of 2018)
Usha Rani Barman Vs. Sri Jogesh Ch. Jana & ors.
None appears in support of the appeal when the
matter is called on.
In view of the above, the appeal and the
connected application are dismissed for default.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
Usha Rani Barman
Sri Jogesh Ch. Jana
Harish Tandon
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
