Disposed

In the Goods of Subodh Chandra Chatterjee (Dec.) v. Na

Calcutta HC19 Dec 2024PLA/296/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for probate of a Will dated 30 January 2009 executed by Subodh Chandra Chatterjee appointing the petitioners as executors. With no caveat filed and an attesting witness's affidavit proving due execution and sound mind, the court found the Will proved and directed grant of probate.

What did the court decide?

Department directed to grant probate of the Will dated 30 January 2009 after completion of formalities; copy of Will to form part of probate.

In the Goods of Subodh Chandra Chatterjee (Dec.)… — Succession and Inheritance | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

OD-56

¶2

ORDER SHEET

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary & Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE

¶4

PLA/296/2023

¶5

IN THE GOODS OF: SUBODH CHANDRA CHATTERJEE, DECEASED

¶6

BEFORE:

¶7

The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date : December 19, 2024.

¶8

Appearance Mr. Uday Narayan Betal, Adv. Mr. Mriganka Patra, Adv. … for the petitioners

¶9

The Court : Mr. Uday Narayan Betal, learned Advocate, is appearing for the petitioner.

¶10

The petitioners have filed the present application for grant of probate of the last Will and Testament dated 30^th January, 2009 executed by the testator Subodh Chandra Chatterjee by appointing the petitioners as executors but in the Will it is recorded as executor.

¶11

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the wife of the testator, his mother and his son and married daughter were predeceased to the testator and accordingly, citations were issued but none has come forward to file no objection or filed caveat and accordingly, the department has issued No Caveat Certificate on 6^th November, 2024.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioners submits that out of the two attesting witnesses, one attesting witness has filed affidavit stating that the testator has executed his last Will and Testament in his presence by appointing the petitioners as executors while possessing good health and fit state of mind.

¶13

¶14

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the testator died on 31^st December, 2017. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have proved the Will and are entitled to get the probate.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the original Will, death certificate of the testator, affidavit of the attesting witness and No Caveat Certificate issued by the department.

¶16

This Court finds that one of the attesting witnesses has stated in his affidavit that the testator has executed his last Will and Testament by appointing the petitioners as executors while possessing good health and fit state of mind.

¶17

Considering the above, this Court finds that the petitioners have proved the Will and they are entitled to get the probate.

¶18

Accordingly, the department is directed to grant probate of the last Will and Testament dated 30^th January, 2009 after completion of all formalities. At the time of grant of probate, the copy of the Will be made part of the probate.

¶19

PLA/296/2023 is disposed of.

¶20

The department is directed not to draw up the order.

¶21

(KRISHNA RAO, J.)

¶22

In the Goods of Subodh Chandra Chatterjee (Dec.) v. Na

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

In the Goods of Subodh Chandra Chatterjee (Dec.) v. Na

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Padma Polymers Vs M/S Super Iron Foundry Private Limited and Ors.

In the Goods of Elizabeth Williams (Dec) Vs N

In the Goods of Raghu Nandan Mody Deceased Vs Na

In the Goods of Samar Chandra Sarkar (Dec) Vs N/a

In the Goods of - Biva Pyne (Dec.) Vs Na

Soumendu Sengupta Vs Sanjit Mallick and Anr.