Sarmistha Dey v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Calcutta HCMAT/1702/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A contempt application in a pending appeal was listed for February 2026 at counsel's joint request; an office memorandum filed by the alleged contemnor was taken on record and a copy ordered to be supplied.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
January 9, 2026 Sl. No.7 Court No.1 s.biswas
¶2
CPAN 348 of 2025 In MAT 1702 of 2017
¶3
Sarmistha Dey
¶4
vs.
¶5
Mr. Arup Sengupta, The Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal
¶6
Ms. Dolon Samanta
¶7
... for the applicant
¶8
Mr. Gourav Das
¶9
... for the alleged contemnor
¶10
Per, Sujoy Paul, A.C.J.
¶11
- Neither the applicant nor the alleged contemnor is armed with the case filed to argue the matter and assist us.
¶12
- On their joint prayer, list the matter in the month of February, 2026.
¶13
- The copy of office memorandum dated 10.11.2025 as filed by the alleged contemnor is however taken on record. Let a copy of the office memorandum be supplied to the other side by Tuesday (i.e. by 13.01.2026).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Sarmistha Dey
- respondent
Arup Sengupta, The Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal
Coram
AI extract
Sujoy Paul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- MAT/1702/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court