Single judge order granting a correction in the name of the respondent insurance company and witness designations in an appellate order dated 29th April 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
16.05.2024
SL No.3 Court No.25 Ali
F.M.A.T. (MV) 797 of 2023
Chandan Mandal & Anr. Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Anr.
Mr. Ashique Mondal, Mr. Subhankar Mandal
…for the appellants/claimants.
Mr. Sanjay Paul, Ms. J. Ghosh …for the Insurance Co.
This matter appears for correction.
In the Cause Title of judgment dated 29th April, 2024 the name of the Insurance Company/respondent was erroneously mentioned as “New United India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.” it should be read as “New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.”.
At the 4th page line 4th the turn “not” should be omitted. At the same page at the 7th line from the bottom the “DW-2” should be read as “PW-2”.
At the 9th page 7th line from top the “PW-1” it should be read as “OPW-1”. At the 12th line, 13th line and 14th line from the top of the said page the turn “PW-1” it should be read as “OPW-1”. At the same page 7th line from bottom the “PW-1” it should be read as “OPW-2”.
At the page 10th line 4th and 12th from top the turn “PW-3” it should be read as “OPW-3”.
2
At page 11th at the second line after calculation portion at the second line after Rs.15,000/- “132” should be incorporated. At the same page 3rd line from the bottom “134” it should be read as “132”.
Let the instant order shall be made a part of
the order passed by this Court on 29.04.2024.
The rest portions of the said order shall remain unaltered.
(Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Chandan Mandal & Anr.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Anr.
Subhendu Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
