Manoranjan Mondal Vs Ashok Kumar Das and Anr.

Heard the learned advocates for the parties it appears that a very small point is involved in this appeal. The instant appeal has been preferred against the order dated 30^th June, 2022 passed by the learned Tribunal in MACC No.414 of 2013 under Section 166 of the M.V. Act.

¶15

The claimants is the injured, who suffered an accident on 5.5.2013 and filed an application under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for getting the compensation only on the ground that he sustained accident due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle bearing no.WB 31 4319 (Truck). The claim case was contested by the insurance company by filing written statement.

¶16

2

¶17

After hearing the parties and after receiving the evidence, the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.7,00,650/- as compensation towards the claimant and directed the insurance company to pay the compensation.

¶18

The said award was satisfied by the insurance company by issuing specific cheques dated July 18, 2022. After receiving the award, the claimants being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the award has preferred the instant appeal.

¶19

It is the sole ground that the award does not order to carry interest as per provision of Section 171 of the M.V. act.

¶20

Learned advocate for the appellant submits that the award must have carried some interests but the learned Tribunal has only awarded interest on default clause.

¶21

Mr. Singh, learned advocate appearing for the insurance company submits that the provision of Section 171 may be applicable in this case. However, he submits that the insurance company has complied with the order, So, after receiving such award, the claiments cannot prefer a separate appeal on the basis of the interest.

¶22

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it appears to me according to the provision of Section 171 of the M.V. Act that award passed by the Tribunal must couple with some interest. In this case learned Tribunal has not awarded any interest. So, in my view the award

¶23

3

¶24

passed by the learned Tribunal is erroneous in respect of non-awarding interest portion on the awarded amount. Thus, the impugned award is modified. The award passed by the learned Tribunal shall carry 6% interest from the date of fling of the application i.e. September 8, 2013 to July 18, 2022.

¶25

The insurance company is directed to comply this order through the office of the learned Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta within six weeks. Upon such deposit, the claimant is at liberty to receive the same on usual norms of identification and certifications.

¶26

Accordingly, FMAT(MV) 544 of 2022 stands allowed. Connected applications, if pending are disposed of.

¶27

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶28

( Subhendu Samanta, J.)

Manoranjan Mondal v. Ashok Kumar Das and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoranjan Mondal v. Ashok Kumar Das and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nurjahan Bewa & Ors. Vs the National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

The Oriental Ins Co. Ltd. Vs Tumpa Sarkar and Ors.

Jharna Saha & Ors. Vs the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Sutapa Paria @ Sutapa Parya & Anr. Vs the New India Assurance Company & Ors.

Badal Maiti &Ors Vs Nicl & Anr.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Madan Chandra Sarakar and Anr.