In FMA 3601 of 2015, the High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal for default due to non-appearance of the appellant, also dismissing pending applications in the absence of representation.
Appeal and pending applications dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 17.08.2023 D.Hira Court No. 12
In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side
FMA 3601 of 2015
M/s. Indian Bank Versus Dilip Kumar Majumdar & Ors.
Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya, ld. Senior counsel, Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya.
… for the respondents
When the matter was taken up on 10th August, 2023, there was no representation for the appellant.
This Court directed the department to list the matter under the caption for dismissal today. Today also there is no representation for the.
In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed for default.
All pending applications, if any, are consequently dismissed.
(V.M. Velumani, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
M/s. Indian Bank
Dilip Kumar Majumdar
V.M. Velumani
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
