Appellants sought withdrawal of two first appeals before the Calcutta High Court. Both appeals and connected applications were dismissed for non-prosecution, with any interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04 - 05 16.08.2024 Ct. No. 11 Jayanta
FAT 228 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 a n d FAT 229 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 (Kamal Kumar Agarwal & Ors. Vs. Bimal Kumar Agarwal & Ors.)
Mr. Aditya Garodia Ms. Rashmi Singhee Mr. Ritoban Sarkar Mr. Pintu Ghosh …. For the appellants (in both the appeals) Mr. Nikunj Berlia Mr. Varun Kothari ….. For the respondent nos. 7, 8, 9 & 27. Mr. Chandrachur Chatterjee …… For the respondent nos. 11, 12, 13 & 17. Mr. A. Kumar ….. For the respondent nos. 1 to 4.
Mr. Aditya Garodia, learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits, upon instruction, that the appellants do not want to preceed with both the appeals.
In view of the above, the appeals being FAT 228 of 2022 and FAT 229 of 2022 and all the applications connected thereto are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Kamal Kumar Agarwal
Bimal Kumar Agarwal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
