Disposed

Raj Tamang (Lama) and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC4 Apr 2024CRR/352/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against Sessions Judge's order issuing arrest warrant after accused failed to appear for charge framing. Court set aside the warrant on condition that the petitioner surrender and seek bail by a fixed date, and directed framing of charge expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Warrant of arrest set aside; petitioner to surrender before Sessions Judge by April 30, 2024 and pray for bail; charge to be framed preferably within May 2024.

Raj Tamang (Lama) and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal and… — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

04.4.2024 Ct.No. 3 Item no.30 nb

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

¶3

CRR 352 of 2023

¶4

Raj Tamang(Lama) & Anr. Vs.

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Sudip Guha, Mr. Sandip Guha Ray, Mr. Ananda Paul,. ..…for the petitioner. Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Ld APP, Mr. Arjun Chowdhury,

¶7

…. For the State.

¶8

This revisional application has been preferred against the order dated 30.9.2023 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kalimpong thereby issued warrant of arrest against the present petitioner in connection with Gorubathan P. S. Case no.38 of 2017 dated 18.7.2017 under Section 448/436/427/323/417 and 379 read with Section 9 of West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act,1972.

¶9

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that initially the present petitioner was enlarged on bail. Thereafter, he was regularly attending the Court but on the fateful date i.e. on September 30, 2023 he could not appear before this Court due

¶10

¶11

to his illness and the learned Sessions Judge has issued the warrant of arrest. He submits that necessary order may be passed, so that the present petitioner may be surrender before the learned Session Judge.

¶12

It is the submission of the learned advocate for the State that due to absence of the accused person, the charge cannot be framed by the learned Sessions Judge. He further submits that necessary direction may be passed for framing of charge within a specified time.

¶13

It appears that the present petitioner along with other 25 persons were arrayed as an accused in this case. Initially the prayer for anticipatory bail of the present petitioner was considered and he was enlarged on bail. It appears that the petitioner cannot appear on September 30, 2023.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant criminal revision is disposed of with a direction that that warrant of arrest issued by the learned Sessions Judge against the present petitioner is hereby set aside with a condition that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned Sessions Judge concerned within April 30, 2024 and shall pray for necessary order for bail. On such prayer, the learned Sessions Judge shall consider the prayer according to law.

¶15

The learned Sessions Judge is further directed to frame the charge of this as early as possible most preferably within May 2024 according to the law.

¶16

¶17

Under the above observation, this criminal revision is disposed of.

¶18

Connected application, if any, are also disposed of.

¶19

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly

¶20

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶21

(Subhendu Samanta, J.)

Raj Tamang (Lama) and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Tamang (Lama) and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aparna Roy Chowdhury and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Mudit Bajoria and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Bikram Roy Dakua Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Abishek Biswakarma Vs State of West Bengal

Soumyadeep Naha Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Khukibala Das and Ors. Vs the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr.