Petitioner sought leave not to press a criminal revision application before the Calcutta High Court. The court dismissed CRR 330 of 2023 as not pressed and vacated any interim order passed in the matter.
Application dismissed as not pressed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 4
03.05.2024
(JPD 7)
Calcutta High Court
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side
(S. Banerjee)
CRR 330 of 2023
Mrityunjoy Karjee Versus Taniya Roy & Anr.
Mr. Subhasish Misra
… for the petitioner
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Mrityunjoy Karjee
Taniya Roy
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
