Criminal revision and review applications disposed of following an amicable settlement between parties. The court quashed the underlying criminal proceeding and discharged petitioners from bail bonds to avoid futile exercise.
Quashed the proceeding; petitioners set at liberty and discharged from bail bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25 12-12-2024 Ct. No.34 b.das
CRR No. 1956 of 2024 +
CRAN 1 of 2024
In the matter of : Nishan Mallick @ Nishan Nizam Mallick & Ors.
….. petitioners .
Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Imdadul Haque Mr. A. Sarkar …for the petitioners. Md. Abu Safder …for the opposite party. Ms. Amita Gaur Ms. Puja Goswami …for State.
Report submitted by the State is taken on record.
It appears from the report and is also submitted by learned counsels for the parties that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and the private opposite party does not intend to proceed with the matter any further.
In view of the above, this Court is inclined to hold that allowing the proceeding to continue further shall only be a futile exercise.
The proceeding being GR Case No.2873 of 2022 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah, South 24 Parganas be quashed.
The petitioners be set at liberty at once and be discharged from their bail bonds.
2
The revisional application being CRR 1956 of 2024
is disposed of.
CRAN 1 of 2024 is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities.
( Suvra Ghosh, J. )
Nishan Mallick @ Nishan Nizam Mallick & Ors.
Opposite party
State
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
