Petitioner's advocate filed written instructions expressing unwillingness to proceed with the revisional application. The court dismissed C.R.R. 1185 of 2014 for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.03.2024
17 Ct. No. 33 KAUSHIK
C.R.R. 1185 of 2014
In Re. Kanishk Sinha
... petitioner
Mr. Sankar Nath Mukherjee Ms. Afroza Nusrat Ms. Rubina Khatoon ... for the petitioner
Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee, ... learned amicus curiae
Mr. Avishek Sinha ... for the State
The learned advocate for the State is present.
The learned amicus curiae appointed on the earlier occassion Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee is also present.
Ms. Afroza Nusrat, the learned advocate appearing with the Sankar Nath Mukherjee submits that the learned advocate Ms. Afroza Nusrat has filed a ‘vakalatnama’ before the department 27th February, 2024 with the learned advocate as aforesaid files a written instruction on behalf of the petitioner expressing the unwillingness to proceed with the hearing of the instant revisional application.
Let the said written instruction be kept on record.
Let the instant revisional application is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
2
Kanishk Sinha
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
