The High Court confirmed interim bail granted previously to the petitioner. The court noted that there was no significant progress in the trial since the interim grant and no breach of conditions by the petitioner.
Interim bail confirmed on the same terms and conditions as previously granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26. 20.11.2024 Court No.29 (Tanmoy)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
CRM (NDPS) 994 of 2024
In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising out of Kaliachak P.S. Case No. 783/2022 dated 22.07.2022.
And
In the matter of: - Sharuk Khan
Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Avishek Sinha Ms. Rajnandini Das
…petitioner. …for the petitioner.
…for the State.
Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Signed By : TANMOY GHOSH High Court of Calcutta 21 st of November 2024 02:36:45 PM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim bail granted on grounds of undue delay in trial should be confirmed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sharuk Khan
State
Arijit Banerjee
Apurba Sinha Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
