Single-judge criminal miscellaneous application for cancellation of bail was disposed of as infructuous following the quashing of underlying criminal proceedings via settlement. Order instructed the quashing order to be kept on record.
Application disposed of as infructuous; order dated June 21, 2024 quashing proceedings kept on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01. 28.11.2024 Court No.29 (Pritam)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
CRM (DB) 2621 of 2023
In Re: - An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
And
In the matter of: - Pawan Agarwal.
…petitioner.
Mr. Safdar Azam, …for the petitioner. Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. P.P. Mr. Koushik Kundu …..for the State. Ms. Rituparna De Ghose, Mr. Mr. Siddhartha Paul, Mr. Souryadeep Ghosh ….for Op no.2.
Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.
2
proceeding be kept on record.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for cancellation of bail remains maintainable after the criminal proceedings have been quashed by settlement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pawan Agarwal
State
Arijit Banerjee
Apurba Sinha Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
