Pabitra Das and Anr. v. State of West Bengal
Calcutta HCCRM (DB)/1240/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners sought relaxation of bail conditions granted in April 2024; State filed a report objecting, alleging non-reporting to the police station. Petitioners sought leave to reply. Matter adjourned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
03.10.2024 Item no. 764. Court No.28. AB
¶2
CRM (DB) 1240 of 2024 With
¶3
CRAN 2 of 2024
¶4
In Re: An Application for relaxation of conditions of bail
¶5
And
¶6
In the matter of : Pabitra Das & Anr. ……Petitioners.
¶7
Mr. Rajdeep Majumdar, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Ms. Sagnika Banerjee, Ms. Aishwarya Bajaj ……for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Imam, Ms. Kanchan Roy ……for the State.
¶8
Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.
¶9
In re : CRAN 2 of 2024
¶10
- The petitioners seek relaxation of conditions of bail that was granted to them by an order dated April 22, 2024, passed in CRM (DB) 1240 of 2024.
¶11
- The State has filed a report objecting to the prayer of the petitioners. According to the State, the petitioners have not been reporting regularly to the concerned Police Station in terms of the bail order.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Pabitra Das
- petitioner
Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Arijit Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM (DB)/1240/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court