Anticipatory bail application under section 438 CrPC concerning allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust in allotment of money under PMAY. Considering the case diary materials and serious allegations, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.07.2024 Sl No. 58 Court No.29 TN (Rejected)
| CRM (A) 2358 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 341 of 2024 dated 19.04.2024 under Sections 406/420/424/471/467/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of:Riko Khatun and another. - petitioners. |
|---|
| Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick …. for the petitioners. |
| Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, Nazmut Touhid … for the State. |
| 1. Considering the materials available in the case diary and the serious allegation has been made with regard to allotment of money under PMAY, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. |
| 2. Accordingly, this application for anticipatory bail stands rejected. |
| 3. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly |
| downloaded from the official website of this Court. |
(Soumen Sen, J.)
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners were entitled to anticipatory bail in a case alleging misappropriation of PMAY funds.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Riko Khatun and another
State
Soumen Sen
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
