In Re Kishor Kumar Handal applied for recall of an anticipatory bail rejection order. The court held that an order recorded under the previous victim's statement will not be modified or recalled.
The application for recalling and/or modifying the order dated 11th July 2024 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.08.2024
Court No.29 Item No. 03
ar CRM (A) 2325 of 2024 with CRAN 1 of 2024
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In Re: Kishor Kumar Handal
Petitioner Mr. Souvik Mitter Mr. Iqbal Kabir Ms. Rajnandini Das Mr. Abhishek Kabir For the Petitioner Mrs. Manasi Roy For the State Mr. Soumya Basu Chaudhuri Mr. A. Banerjee For the Victim Re: CRAN 1 of 2024
2
(Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar , J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order rejecting the anticipatory bail application should be recalled or modified despite suppression of facts by the complainant regarding the marital status.
Whether the wrong submission made by the State counsel forms a valid ground to alter the previous order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishor Kumar Handal
Soumen Sen
Uday Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
