Allowed

Sannyasi Mridha v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC11 Jul 2024CRM (A)/2315/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 447/325/326/307/506/34 IPC. The court found custodial interrogation unnecessary and directed release upon furnishing a bond with sureties, subject to standard conditions under Section 438 CrPC and weekly meetings with the investigating officer.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, one local, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions and weekly IO meetings.

Sannyasi Mridha Vs the State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

11.07.2024 SL No.15 Court No.29 (gc) (Allowed)

¶2

CRM (A) 2315 of 2024

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Nakashipara Police Station Case No.464 of 2024 dated 16.05.2024 under Sections 447/325/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of : Sannyasi Mridha

¶6

Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. Kusal Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Narattam Acharyya

¶8

….For the Petitioner. Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee

¶9

… For the State.

¶10

The learned Counsel for petitioner submits that due to the dispute between the two neighbours, a false complaint has been lodged against the petitioner.

¶11

The learned Counsel for the State has produced the case diary and opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶12

Considering the materials available in the case diary, the nature and extent of complicity of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged offence, the nature of injury sustained by the de facto complainant and other family members of the de facto complainant, we are of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.

¶13

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Sannyasi Mridha , shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

¶14

Signed By : GURUPADA CHAKRABARTY High Court of Calcutta 12 th of July 2024 12:04:08 PM

¶15

¶16

the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is further directed that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week till the submission of the final report and shall appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia at Krishnanagar in connection with G.R. Case No.2677 of 2024 within two weeks from date.

¶17

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is disposed of.

¶18

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly

¶19

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

(Soumen Sen, J.)

¶21

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)

¶22

Signed By : GURUPADA CHAKRABARTY High Court of Calcutta 12 th of July 2024 12:04:08 PM

Sannyasi Mridha v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sannyasi Mridha v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kader @ Molla Abdul Kader Vs Samita Kar and Ors.

Jnanbhusan Saha and Anr. Vs Muslam Sekh and Ors.

Sharmistha Majumdar Vs Kriti Safui and Ors.

Lutfal Mandal @ Nutu Vs the State of West Bengal

Sk. Parvez Kipria @ Sk Parvez Kibria Vs State of West Bengal

Sujit Sharma @ Kalua @ Sujit and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal