Allowed
Susanta Patra v. Sujit Kumar Maity
Calcutta HCCPAN/631/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application to modify a 2019 order directing respondent no.3 to approve a panel for a clerk post, on the ground that respondent no.3 was not the appropriate authority. The court modified the order, replacing the approval direction with one requiring reconsideration of the petitioner's grievance in accordance with law; the contempt application was disposed of as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Order dated December 2, 2019 modified: approval direction deleted, substituted with direction to reconsider petitioner's grievance in accordance with law; CPAN 631/2020 disposed as infructuous.