Single judge disposed of a contempt application filed in writ proceedings. The court observed that the petitioner had submitted the impugned order was complied with, rendering the application moot.
The contempt application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.08.2024 Ct. No. 14 Sl. No.01 AGM
In The High Court At Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side
C.P.A.N. 479 of 2022 Dr. Dipanwita Mukherjee -versus
Mr. Biswanath Nandy in W.P.A. 12906 of 2021 Dr. Dipanwita Mukherjee -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ayan Banerjee Ms. Debasree Dhamali
… For the petitioner.
Mr. Swapan Kumar Dutta, Sr. Adv. & AGP Mr. Prodyot Kumar Das … For the alleged contemnor.
Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits, upon instruction that, the order passed by the Court has duly been complied with.
In view of the aforesaid submission, there is no requirement of proceeding with the contempt application any further.
Contempt application stands disposed of.
Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.
( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Dr. Dipanwita Mukherjee
Mr. Biswanath Nandy
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
